Platform configuration audit checklist
Platform areas to consider:
- 1 Create clarity with consistent Email Template & Workflow labels
- 2 Make Files & eLearning Packages easier to manage
- 3 Keep your drop-down lists relevant and easy to use
- 4 Improve usability by reviewing your forms
- 5 Reduce confusion by reviewing duplicate reports
- 6 Keep Workflows maintainable and easy to trust
- 7 Remove old test templates and unused items
- 8 Make your Dashboards actionable
- 9 Use consistent Duration Types where possible (optional)
- 10 Can accessplanit help?
Search the Knowledge Base
Related Help Guide Pages
Learn how to tidy up the data in your platform to declutter and improve your team's navigation!
Keeping your platform configuration tidy, consistent, and up to date makes it easier for your team to work efficiently, reduces confusion, and helps maintain a better experience for your customers!
This checklist will help you identify areas of platform data debt! These are areas that may have grown messy over time, become inconsistent, or no longer support your current processes. You don’t need to tackle everything at once, but regularly reviewing these areas can make a huge difference to the usability and maintainability of your platform.
Create clarity with consistent Email Template & Workflow labels
Clear naming conventions make it easier to search, filter, manage, and maintain your platform configuration.
One of the most common things we see is naming conventions becoming inconsistent over time. This often happens naturally as different team members create items in different ways, but it can make finding the item you need difficult, and make getting an overview of your items difficult.
Ovewtime you may start to notice notice:
Email Templates with inconsistent wording
Workflow labels using different structures
Labels containing abbreviations only some team members understand
Items labelled as “New”, “Current”, “Latest”, or “Test” without a clear standard
There’s nothing wrong with using labels such as:
Critical
Test
Current
Archive
However, the important thing is consistency.
Questions to ask yourself
Can your team easily search for the correct Workflow or Email Template?
Would a new starter understand your naming conventions?
Are similar items grouped together logically i.e. with prefixes?
Good practice ideas
Agree a standard naming format across your team
Include useful identifiers such as:
Department
Process
Audience/recipient
(Then decide if these will be used as a prefix or a suffix)
Keep your labels concise but descriptive
Clearly label or remove unused items
Where to go
Add company branding to Email Templates
Make Files & eLearning Packages easier to manage
Consistent labels on Files and eLearning Packages make it easier to locate the correct resources and avoid duplicate uploads.
Over time, it’s common to end up with:
Multiple versions of the same file
Files uploaded with unclear names
Inconsistent abbreviations
Old eLearning Packages that are no longer used
This can make searching difficult and increase the risk of using outdated content.
Questions to ask yourself
Can your team quickly identify the correct file?
Do you have any duplicate files?
Can your team find the most recent version of an eLearning package?
Are your naming conventions consistent?
Could someone unfamiliar with the platform understand the labels?
Good practice ideas
Include version numbers where appropriate
Use consistent wording and formatting
Clearly label or remove outdated files and packages
Avoid vague labels such as “Latest file” or “Jane’s version”
Where to go
Keeping your platform organised
Keep your drop-down lists relevant and easy to use
Reviewing File Types, Note Types, and Task Types helps keep your platform aligned with your current processes.
A really common source of data debt is holding onto old options “just in case” they’re needed again later!
Over time, this can lead to:
Overcrowded drop-down lists
Duplicate options
Outdated terminology
Team members selecting inconsistent values
When your options no longer reflect how your business operates, it becomes harder to maintain clean, accurate reporting.
Questions to ask yourself
Are there options no one uses anymore?
Are there duplicate or very similar values?
Do the options still reflect your current processes?
Are users selecting inconsistent values because there are too many choices?
Good practice ideas
Remove or deactivate outdated options
Merge duplicate values where possible
Standardise terminology
Review lists regularly as your processes evolve
Where to go
Improve usability by reviewing your forms
Your forms are some of the most heavily used areas of the platform, so keeping them clean and relevant has a huge impact on usability.
The number one issue we often see is forms containing:
Fields no longer used
Duplicate fields
Unclear fields ('what is this field for?')
Fields not flagged as mandatory, which leads to data gaps
A well-configured form makes it easier for your team to complete tasks accurately and helps new starters understand the platform more quickly.
Questions to ask yourself
Are there fields no one uses anymore?
Are there duplicate fields collecting similar information?
Are there important fields that should be mandatory?
Are users regularly leaving gaps in key data?
Good practice ideas
Hide unused fields and set important fields as mandatory using the Configure Form option
Add descriptions to Custom Fields to provide guidance (if you add a description to a Custom Field, this will appear as helpful guidance text against the field within 24 hours)
Regularly review forms with your operational teams
Where to go
Reduce confusion by reviewing duplicate reports
Keeping your reports organised helps users quickly find the correct report and understand which reporting tool to use.
Over time, it’s common for duplicate or very similar reports to build up within both:
Report Writer
Report Engine
This can lead to confusion around:
Which report is the ‘correct’ version
Which reports are still in use
Which reporting tool should be used for each KPI/measure/export
Questions to ask yourself
Are there duplicate reports covering the same purpose?
Is it clear which report should be used?
Are there outdated reports no one accesses anymore?
Important to know
Report Writer reports can be deleted by the accessplanit team
Report Engine reports can be managed directly within your platform
Good practice ideas
Clearly label or remove redundant reports
Add clear naming conventions (e.g. to cover ownership, process, purpose, content)
Use Report Engine descriptions to provide context
Keep only actively used reports visible to your team
Where to go
Keep Workflows maintainable and easy to trust
Workflows are designed to save time, improve consistency, and automate your processes. However, they should be regularly reviewed to check for duplicates and potential improvements.
A common scenario is opening the Workflow DataGrid and seeing:
Multiple Workflows with very similar names
Old Workflows that are still active
Workflows that have been heavily edited over time, and the description no longer matches what the Workflow actually does
This often leads to uncertainty around making changes because no one wants to accidentally break something.
The impact of Workflow clutter can include:
Increased risk of errors
Duplicate communications
Incorrect automation behaviour
Reduced confidence in making improvements
Potential impact on your customers’ experience
Questions to ask yourself
Are all active Workflows still needed?
Are there duplicate or overlapping Workflows?
Do the labels and descriptions accurately explain the Workflow?
Does your team know what each Workflow does, and do they feel confident maintaining them?
Good practice ideas
Regularly review active Workflows
Disable and clearly label retired Workflows
Update descriptions when changes are made
Document how your Workflows fit into your customer journeys and internal processes
Document complex Workflow logic
Agree ownership for Workflow maintenance
Where to go
Remove old test templates and unused items
Old test items can clutter your platform and make it harder to find real/live data.
This often includes:
Test Email Templates
Old Workflow tests
Temporary files
Unused eLearning Packages
Test Course Templates
While these items may feel harmless, they can:
Make searching harder
Increase confusion
Lead to accidental usage of outdated content
Questions to ask yourself
Are test items clearly labelled?
Are there old test items no longer needed?
Could someone accidentally use an outdated template?
Good practice ideas
Regularly review and remove unused test items
Clearly label anything still needed for testing
Archive historic configuration where appropriate
Make your Dashboards actionable
Your Dashboards should immediately help you and your team understand what needs attention.
A useful Dashboard should provide visibility, direction, and value as soon as someone logs in. It’s not there to display data for the sake of it.
Questions to ask yourself
Do your Dashboards help you to prioritise work?
Is the information still relevant?
Are there gadgets you don’t use anymore?
Does the Dashboard support you to do your job?
Good practice ideas
Focus on actionable information
For example; if you have a DataGrid gadget showing you upcoming Courses, ask yourself - ‘what do I do with this data?', 'what is it telling me?’
Remove outdated or unused gadgets
Encourage your team members to build a Dashboard Area that caters to them
Good Dashboards help users quickly answer questions such as:
What needs my attention today?
What tasks are overdue?
Which Courses need action?
Are there any issues I should review?
Where to go
Use consistent Duration Types where possible (optional)
Using consistent Duration Types can make Courses easier to search, filter, and report on.
Using the a standard Duration Type across your Courses means you can more easily search on this information from your DataGrids, e.g. filter on a duration that is ‘greater than 1’ to see all Courses over 1 day.
However, this is one area where flexibility may still make sense depending on your business model. It’s perfectly fine to use a wider range of Duration Types if that better reflects your Course offering.
Questions to ask yourself
Are Duration Types being used consistently?
Could similar Courses be grouped more clearly?
Good practice ideas
Standardise Duration Types where practical, e.g. move as much as possible into ‘hour’ or ‘day’
Consistency is helpful here, but operational accuracy is more important.
Can accessplanit help?
Yes we absolutely can!
If you need support reviewing your platform, we offer consultancy via our professional services where our team can work with you to check through your platform and identify areas for improvement. This can be a big time saver, and give you peace of mind by supporting you through the process.
Please note
This is a chargeable service, if you’re interested, speak to your Customer Success Manager to find out more or to get a quote!